I need some assistance with these assignment. rules of engagement Thank you in advance for the help! The Understanding of the Rules of Engagement (ROEs), the limited war ideology and the assumptions as seen through different perspectives along the chain of command: Insert your name here.Insert your institute’s name.AbstractThis paper discusses the understanding of the Rules of Engagement employed during the Vietnam War at different levels of the chain of command. It analyses the lack of rapport between the civilian government and the military that existed then, and the frustration of the military personnel at the restrictions imposed on them during the war. It was felt at the time that rules of engagement were designed more to serve a political purpose and thwart Soviet and Chinese intervention rather than to win the war. Indeed many believe that the ROEs extended the war unnecessarily.According to the online encyclopedia, Wikipedia, ‘In military or police operations, rules of engagement (ROE) determine when, where and how force shall be used.’ The rules of engagement are designed so as to ensure that uncontrolled violence is prevented, civilian casualties are minimized and the conflict does not escalate. However, restrictive rules of engagement undermine the ability of the military or police to resolve a conflict, as, according to many critics of the war, was the case in the US invasion of Vietnam (1959). The US president at the time, Lyndon Johnson, in order to contain the conflict set down strict rules of engagement that hindered the forces from striking or utilizing force in certain areas. This was done in order to thwart the perceived threat of Soviet or Chinese intervention and to gain support at home. President Johnson wanted the conflict to be restricted to South Vietnam, although aerial bombings in North Vietnam were allowed at certain point in the war. He believed the war was a counter-insurgency battle and the rules of engagement thus were justified.The Secretary of Defense, Robert Mcnamara, authored the rules of engagement. He saw the Vietnamese invasion as a ground war and thus saw little use of the US air force. Thus, the rules of engagement he designed restricted the aerial fighting the most. Mcnamara too saw the entire conflict as a counter-insurgency battle and thus tailored the rules of engagement to be such that most military strategies and moves were to be self-defensive. It was not until the Gulf of Tonkin incident in the August of 1964 that U.S. air strikes were allowed to be more aggressive.It is no surprise that the rules of engagement set down by the civilian suits in the government were not very popular with the military strategists. General William Westmoreland was a key architect of the military strategy. In order to avoid further disaster, he forbade any unit smaller then 750 men from executing military operations. Shortly after he was given command of all US forces in Vietnam, he employed an aggressive search-and-destroy policy with the National Liberation Front. He believed that the NLF could be defeated through large scale use of artillery, air-power and large-unit battles. This strategy was successful enough for a while for Westmoreland to believe that the end of the war was in sight. The Tet offensive of 1967 discredited Westmoreland’s claims when NLF forces supported by the North Vietnamese army launched attacks on cities across South Vietnam and proved their ability to carry out such large-scale attacks. The individual soldiers on the field, as mentioned before in this paper, expressed discontent with the rules of engagement. They felt the restrictions had tied their hands and limited their capacity for effective warfare. The rules of engagement were in blatant violation of all military principles, and were catering more to political reasons than military. However, according to Major Mark S. Martins in his thesis presented to The Judge Advocate General’s School, ‘few senior leaders believed that soldiers understood ROE well before the My Lai massacre, and even fewer believed that soldiers adhered carefully to the ROE’.The Battalion Commanders too were not very happy with the suppressive rules of engagement. They felt that they hindered them from rooting out the enemy. Because of the restrictions of the ROE, an average time span of two weeks passed between the identification of a target area and permission to bomb it. It was a widely accepted belief that the Rules of Engagement limited the military operations much more than the international laws of armed conflict.The Division Commanders, like all other military personnel, believed that more lax rules of engagement and increased aerial strikes would have lead to an early end to the war. The rules of engagement prevented them from striking at the vulnerable locations and from stopping movement along the Ho Chi Minh Trail, which was used to move supplies to the Viet Cong. They felt they lacked the training for counter-insurgency warfare and the restrictions only obstructed the fighting, while negating the technological superiority the US had over the enemy, and placing the enemy at an obvious advantage.The difference in the war ideologies and the lack of understanding between the civilian government and the military made the rules of engagement a problem that has been the subject of many debates to this day. Many claim that the ROEs were one of the main reasons for the failure of the Vietnam War. ReferencesRules of Engagement (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_of_engagementMartins, Mark S. (1994). Rules Of Engagement From Land Forces: Matter Of Training, Not Lawyering. Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=ADA456629Marek, Edward S. (2007). The case of General “Jack” Lavelle, the suits double-crossed him. Talking Proud. Retrieved from http://www.talkingproud.us/Retired/Retired/Lavelle_files/page131-rules-of-engagement-story.pdfHickman, Kennedy. Vietnam War: General William Westmoreland. About.com, Military History. Retrieved from http://militaryhistory.about.com/od/1900s/p/westmoreland.htmRosenberg, Jennifer. Vietnam War. About.com, 20th Century History. Retrieved from http://history1900s.about.com/od/vietnamwar/a/vietnamwar.htmDorschel, Matthew J. (1995). The Effects of Restrictive ROEs on the Rolling Thunder Air Campaign. Retrieved from http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/1995/DM.htm.
by admin | Jan 11, 2021 | Uncategorized | 0 comments
I need some assistance with these assignment. rules of engagement Thank you in advance for the help!
A professional Academic Services Provider
We are Built on the Values of Reliability, Proffessionalism, and Integrity
We are a Custom Academic Writing service provider with over a decade of extensive experience in the academic and business writing service industry. We are consistently engaged in advising students on the methodologies of coping with essay writing, term papers, thesis, dissertation and many other approaches towards handling assignments Our main goal is to help present a conceptual model of papers to our clients. Whether it is as a result of academic difficulties, Burnout during studies, or simply the need to have that extra time for your personal growth, what we are is an institution that only focuses on your Academic Growth. By presenting a paper worthy of turning in, we provide you with an excellent model that matches or supersedes your requirements. Our strong belief in academic integrity is held to the highest standards. As such, all papers are developed from scratch and run through software to gurantee authenticity (100 % PLAGIARISM FREE). The Papers are pre-marked by our tutors to ensure it matches the required marking schemes. On deliverly, the paper guarantees top grades and an improved GPA.Our Core Values.
1. Reliability: Timeliness and expertise plus experience enable us to meet our clients' expectations even within the shortest deadlines.Our Strict hiring policy ensures we have the best writers to meet our clients large portifolio. Additionally, our customer support is available 24/7 to answer all queries.
2. Professionalism: With over a decade in the academic service industry, our contents adhere to strict academic standards and professionalism. Our customer service representatives conduct themselves in manners that reflect our core values with the aim of meeting our clients to satisfaction.
3. Integrity: Our growth rate has been attributed to the Integrity of our institution. Our word with our customers is a bond that defines each and every operation in our institution. Stay anonymous and feel secure with us.
Guarantees
1. Quality Assurance: We conduct an evaluation test on every order and determine its level of complexity. As a result, every paper is matched with an expert who is best suited to deliver and surpass expectations. Ensure all details are as thorough as possible. Quality is no longer a luxury, it is your right and we are here to provide.
2. Original Content/ Plagiarism Free: Plagiarism is considered as Academic fraud. As such, we go to great lenghts to ensure a paper remain original. By crafting each paper from scratch and running it through up to date plagiarism checking tools ensure all papers are unique. Additionally, we do not, under any circumstance re-sell papers. The delivered paper remains a property of the client.
3. Money Back Policy: We are a customer-oriented service. As such, we have simple rules that expedite this process making it as simple as ABC.We issue 100% refund for the following: if we received a double payment from you; if you placed similar orders twice (or more) and paid for all of them; the writer has not been assigned; you asked to cancel the order within 20 minutes after placing it; an e-Check payment has been sent (the Dispute Manager will contact you accordingly). Other cases require an in-depth investigation by a Dispute Department. The Dispute Manager will get in touch with you within 24 hours to solve the case.You are a valued customer. We take great pride in our customer service so be rest-assured that the dispute process will be quick and painless.
4. Security Policy: The following outlined statements establish our security policies concerning any personal information we may collect about you when you visit our website. By the following statement, we guarantee confidentiality of the gathered information which under no circumstances will be disclosed to third parties. The data is stored for noncommercial use only in order to furnish clients with the quality service and support. Such information is only used for the improvement of the content and service delivery .
5 .Free Revisions: In some instances, the customer feels the need to make alterations to the delivered paper. Revisions are done at no extra cost if it does not include: complete alteration of the papers due to additional instructions not indicated in the original order and if it is not past ten days upon your approval.
6. 24/7 Customer Care: Reliability stems as a core pillar of our institution. As such, we are available throughout to handle all task and serve our clients.
Process of Placing an Order
NOTE: If you have any questions, feel free to Engage our Customer Support Team before we can commence the project.ALL THE BEST”:
Recent Comments